Are You Hot In That?

It's been a series of adventures since I last posted. Two weeks ago I went to Civil War Weekend at the Historic LeDuc Estate in Hastings. If you've been around a little bit, you'll recall that this is the same house where I had my photo shoot in July. It's a really stunning historic estate in a charming Mississippi River town. General William LeDuc was a quartermaster in the Civil War, and his home is architecturally significant as it is the most complete intact example of the work of Andrew Jackson Downing. It's just a gorgeous place and the staff are gracious enough to let us use it as their playground.

I generally stay away from hot events, because I just don't handle the heat well, and with a history of kidney stones I try to avoid situations which might lead to intense dehydration. However, I also have a history of being unstoppable, and so in spite of the near-100 degree weather with no breeze and full sun, I really enjoyed my time picnicking and playing games and playing faux-bridesmaid in a faux-wedding.

And this happened:





That's me and my dear fried Ashley, who came all the way up from Chicago for the weekend! Proof that ladies in hoops can pretty much do anything, including hoop-trundling. That happened at the end of the day on Saturday. I have never been quite so happy to go home to running water and take a shower after such a warm day!

Sunday was much cooler and the theme of the day was mourning and death rituals. I was able to put on my new mourning clothes and we decked out the house for mourning, with black crape (or a decent approximation of it) on the mirrors and the shutters drawn. I also gave a really well-received lecture on mourning - I had to give it twice over because they couldn't fit everyone into the parlor to hear it!

We also had the opportunity to have our "image struck" by Dave Rambow. Dave Rambow is a wet-plate photographer, meaning he uses the mid-19th century methods of creating images on glass or metal plates. Dave is, I am convinced, the best at what he does, and it was a real treat to have our picture taken with him. Ashley had sent this picture to me beforehand, with the idea that we should imitate it:

It's such a sweet image, and makes one wonder about the relationship between these two girls. Plus, they look a little bit like Ashley and I. We showed the image to Dave, and he immediately set about staging it. It took three tries to get it just right, because it's not a perfect science and we were the first shot of the day, but we didn't mind because it was so much fun, and the finished product was so awesome:

What do you think? Did we hit the nail on the head? We had to add some seating because I'm a bit taller than Ashley (I'm 5'9 so I'm a bit taller than a lot of people). I think it turned out stunning, even if I did end up with a fat face.

We also did this one. The pose was my idea. I've had plenty of potential captions, such as "Ashley teaches Betsy how to read," or "See? It's right there. I told you!" If you have an interesting caption, go ahead and leave it in the comments!

I like these kinds of poses, the staged-impromptu poses that look like a moment out of time but really take quite a bit of time to set up. It was also a lot of fun to talk with site visitors about the photography process, and I know that plenty of them went home with stories to tell about watching us have our likeness taken.

Oh! I almost forgot to mention: the jumbles were a huge hit! They came out of the oven VERY crunchy, but over time they softened up and never went stale. New recipe in my Civil War wheelhouse!

It's been a busy month since then, with other trips around the state and busy times at work. Next up: a trip east to Civil War Weekend at Wade House in Greenbush, Wisconsin. I've never been to this event, but I've been asked to go for several years, and I'm finally able to make it happen. I get to see some people that I don't often get to see, and hopefully make some new friends. Fingers crossed for good weather!

Jumbles, or Adventures in Baking

I do not consider myself any sort of culinary artist. As a child I somehow skipped the mind-meld that allowed me to learn the collective cooking knowledge possessed by my mother, and her mother, and her mother's mother. I also never took a class about cooking in school - we had our choice of classes in Family and Consumer Sciences, and unsurprisingly, I chose Clothing Technology.

So, I'm a bit of a remedial at cooking. Living history has taught me how to experiment in cooking - you have to take recipes that are often cryptic, which use different ingredients than we do, with different techniques. Cooking and food science changed in the 1880s with Fanny Farmer and the advent of home economics, so to cook like a woman from the 1860s, you have to rethink everything you know about cooking. Since I don't know much except what I've learned from experience, this is actually an advantage for me!

I have a few standard recipes that I can do - orange cake, shortbread, some quick breads, and a really simple potato salad recipe from Mrs. Beeton. I try to conquer a new recipe every now and then, and for an event next weekend, I decided I wanted to make jumbles.

Jumbles are a period cookie. There are some, according to my brief Google search, who believe that jumbles may be the first cookie to make it to America, perhaps even to Jamestown. According to our friend Wikipedia they originated in the Middle East or the Mediterranean in the Middle Ages as a treat that kept well and could be taken on the road by travelers. They are easy to make, don't require too many ingredients, and thus are relatively inexpensive.

So, I set out to try them. I searched Google Books for recipes. I found recipes in The Virginia Housewife (1831), Miss Leslie's Directions for Cookery (1860), and more. Pretty much every big-name recipe book of the 19th century has some variation on them. I decided to go with the recipes in Elizabeth Lea's Domestic Cookery (1859), because she gives very clear directions and has several different recipes. I went with the "Common Jumbles", for which she has this to say:

"Take a pound of flour, half a pound of butter, and three-quarters of sugar, three eggs, a little nutmeg, and rose brandy. Mix the butter and sugar together, and add the flour and eggs; mold them in rings, and bake them slowly."

 So that's it. Pretty straightforward, for a period recipe - so many early recipes rely on comparisons, such as "a piece of butter the size of an egg", relying on the cook's knowledge and experience. I pulled out my scale and measured out the ingredients. I threw in some seasonings based on what I knew would probably make a good taste - in this case, cinnamon and nutmeg. I added the cinnamon because I did not have any rose brandy (another adventure for another day) and other jumble recipes in the book called for cinnamon and nutmeg. So like a good housewife, I made do with what I had.

Dry ingredients on the left, wet ingredients on the right

I chose to use three eggs - there are some who say that period chicken eggs were smaller than the eggs we have today, but instead of cutting out some of the egg I decided to chance it and add more flour if need be. Surprisingly, the dough turned out pretty well - maybe a little sticky, but no real need for more flour. I took a tablespoon of the dough, rolled it into a ball, and then rolled that ball into a long strand of dough on the counter. After that, I looped them around and pinched the ends to make a ring.

Rolling it out...

...forming a ring. Other fancier twists could be used.

The "cook slowly" direction needed translating. In period cooking, you are directed (if the author is feeling generous about giving directions) to cook in a "quick oven", a "slow oven", or a "moderate oven". These refer to the temperature of the oven - a quick oven is hot and cooks more quickly, a slow oven is not as hot and cooks slowly. I decided to try the first sheet of cookies at 350. I would think of 350 as more of a moderate oven, but surprisingly, in 15 minutes the cookies were quite done. They smelled delicious, and a taste test proved it. These may be some of my favorite cookies. They come out of the oven soft and fluffy, with a little crunch to them; as they cool, they get very crunchy and hard - definitely a cookie that would stay good for a long time. Cooking them a little less would make a softer cookie, naturally.

Before baking

After baking! They don't get very dark on top - you basically have to trust your nose.

So here is my translated recipe, for you! (Also for me so that I don't forget it next time.) I use a scale for measuring out ingredients, so if you're used to the cup measurements, you'll have to do your own translating (a pound of flour usually equals about 3 1/2 or 4 cups).

Betsy's Jumbles

1 lb flour (I used unbleached)
2 sticks butter, softened
3/4 lb sugar (I used plain white sugar)
3 eggs
1 tsp cinnamon
Heaping 1/2 tsp nutmeg, or to taste (I really like nutmeg, but others may like less of it)

Cream butter and sugar together, add eggs. Mix in flour, cinnamon and nutmeg. Pinch off dough by the tablespoon, form into balls, then roll into long strands and form into rings by pinching the ends. Put the cookies on an ungreased baking sheet and bake at 350 for 14 to 16 minutes; watch closely in the last few minutes to prevent burning.

(A brief note: After I posted a picture of the jumbles on Facebook, there was a hue and cry for information, so I was spurred on to write this up real quick-like and post it. Just goes to show you - I love knowing that people out there are reading this and want more. It's very touching! Hope you all stick around and comment!)